زلازل

الخطر الزلزالي حسب هيئة الطوارئ الأمريكية FEMA (الجزء التاسع)

أبحاث الزلازلالكاتب
شارك المنشور على حساباتك ...

المراجع:

  1. Abrahamson, N. A., and W. J. Silva. 2008. Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA GroundMotion Relations. Earthquake Spectra, 24(1): 67-97.
  2. Allen and Hoshall, Jack R. Benjamin and Associates, and Systan Inc. 1985. An Assessment of Damage and Casualties for Six Cities in the Central United States Resulting from Earthquakes in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Prepared for FEMA.
  3. Algermissen, S. T., M. Hopper, K. Campbell, W. A. Rinehart, D. Perkins, K. V. Steinbrugge, H. J. Lagorio, D. F. Moran, L. S. Cluff, H. J. Degenkolb, C. M. Duke, G. 0. Gates, D. W. Jacobson, R. A. Olson, and C. R. Allen. 1973. A Study of Earthquake Losses in the Los Angeles, California Area. Washington, D.C.: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
  4. Applied Technology Council. 1985. Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, ATC-13. Redwood City: Applied Technology Council.
  5. Applied Technology Council. 2010. Here Today – Here Tomorrow: The Road to Earthquake Resilience in San Francisco, Potential Earthquake Impacts: Technical Documentation. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council Publication ATC 52-1A.
  6. Aroni, S., and Durkin, M. E. 1985. Injuries and Occupant Behavior in Earthquakes. Proc. Joint U.S. – Romanian Seminar on Earthquake & Energy, Vol. 2 (September): 3-40.
  7. Atkinson G.M., and D.M. Boore. 2002. Empirical Ground-motion Relationships for Subduction Zone Earthquake and their Application to Cascadia and Other Regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, in review.
  8. Atkinson, G.M., and D.M. Boore. 2006. Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 96, no. 6: 2181-2205. doi: 10.1785/0120050245.
  9. Bartlett, S.F., and T.L. Youd. 1992. Empirical Prediction of Lateral Spread Displacement. edited by: Hamada, M., and O’Rourke, T. D., Proceedings from the Fourth Japan-U.S. Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures for Soil Liquefaction, v I: 351 – 365., Technical Report NCEER-92-0019.
  10. Basoz, Nesrin, and John Mander. 1999. Enhancement of the Highway Transportation Lifeline Module in Hazus, prepared for the National Institute of Building Sciences (January).
  11. Boore, D.M., and Atkinson M.A. 2008. Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01s and 10.0s. Earthquake Spectra, 24(1):99-138.
  12. Campbell, K.W., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2003. Updated Near-Source Ground-Motion (Attenuation) Relations for the Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration and Acceleration Response Spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 93, no. 1 (February): 314-331.
  13. Campbell, K. W. and Y. Bozorgnia. 2008. NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10s.. Earthquake Spectra, 24(1): 139-171.
  14. Cheu, D. H. 1994. Personal Communication – Comments on Casualty Issues, April.
  15. Chiou, B. S. and Youngs R.R. 2008. An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 24(1): 173-215.
  16. Chopra, Anil K., 1995. Dynamics of Structures. Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  17. Coburn, A.W. and Spence, R.J. 1992. Factors Determining Human Casualty Levels in Earthquakes: Mortality Prediction in Building Collapse. Proceedings of the 10WCEE, Madrid : 5989 – 5994.
  18. Comartin-Reis. 2001. HAZUS99 SR-1 Validation Study. Prepared for the National Institute of Buildings Sciences and the Federal Emregency Management Agency, Washington DC.
  19. Composite Earthquake Catalog. 2002. Advanced National Seismic System, Berkeley: Northern California Earthquake Data Center.Czarnecki, Robert Martin. 1973. Earthquake Damage to Tall Buildings. Structures Publication No. 359, Dept. of Civil Engineering, M.I.T.
  20. CUSEC Association of State Geologists. 2008. Liquefaction Susceptibility Map. https://cusec.org/earthquake-maps-data/
  21. Dowding, C.H. and Rozen. 1978. A., Damage to Rock Tunnels from Earthquake Shaking. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, New York: American Society of Civil Engineers (February).
  22. Durkin, M.E. 1992. Improving Earthquake Casualty and Loss Estimation. Proc. 10 WCEE, Madrid: 557 – 562.
  23. Durkin, M. E. 1995. Fatalities, Nonfatal Injuries, and Medical Aspects of the Northridge Earthquake, The Northridge, California Earthquake of 17 January 1994, CDMG, Spec. Pub. 116, 247254.
  24. Durkin, M. and Murakami, H.1989. Casualties, Survival, and Entrapment in Heavily Damaged Buildings. Proc. 9 WCEE, Vol. VII, Kyoto:, 977 – 982.
  25. Durkin, M. E. and Thiel, C. C. 1991. Integrating Earthquake Casualty and Loss Estimation. Sacramento: Proc. Of the Workshop on Modeling Earthquake Casualties for Planning and Response.
  26. Earthquake Data Base. 2002. National Earthquake Information Center, Golden: United States Geological Survey.
  27. 1986. Report on the North Palm Springs, California earthquake—July 8, 1986. Oakland, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
  28. Egan, J.A., and D.A. Sangrey. 1978. Critical State Model for cyclic load pore pressure, Proceedings. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Pasadena, (June): 19-21.
  29. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1992. FEMA 178 – NEHRP Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings, Washington, D. C.: Developed by the Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
  30. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1992a. A Benefit-Cost Model for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Volume 1: A User’s Manual. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA Publication 227.
  31. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1992b. A Benefit-Cost Model for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Volume 2: Supporting Documentation. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA Publication 227.
  32. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1994a. Seismic Rehabilitation of Federal Buildings: A Benefit/Cost Model, Volume 1: A User’s Manual. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA Publication 255.
  33. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1994b. Seismic Rehabilitation of Federal Buildings: A Benefit/Cost Model, Volume 2: Supporting Documentation. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA Publication 255.
  34. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1995a. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, Washington, D.C.: Part 1 ‐ Provisions. FEMA 222A.
  35. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1996a. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Washington, D.C.: FEMA 273.
  36. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2000. Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. Washington D.C.; Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA Publication 351.
  37. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2006. Designing for Earthquakes: A Manual for Architects. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA Publication 454.
  38. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2015. NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures Volume I: Part 1 Provisions, Part 2 Commentary, FEMA P-1050-1/2015 Edition, Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security by the Building Seismic Safety Council of the National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.
  39. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2017. Hazus Estimated Annualized Earthquake Losses for the United States, Federal Emergency Management Agency Publication (April): P-366. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/14973628293367831a863fd9c5490379b28409d541efe/ FEMAP-366_2017.pdf
  40. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2019. Hazus Earthquake Model, FEMA Standard Operating Procedure for Hazus Earthquake Data Preparation and Scenario Analysis. Federal Emergency Management Agency (May).
  41. Ferritto, J.M. 1982. An Economic Analysis of Earthquake Design Levels. Port, Hueneme: Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory, TN No. N‐1640.
  42. Ferritto, J.M. 1983. An Economic Analysis of Earthquake Design Levels for New Concrete Construction. Port Hueneme: Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory, TN No. N‐1671.
  43. Frankel, A., C. Mueller, T. Barnhard, D. Perkins, E. Leyendecker, N. Dickman, S. Hanson, and M. Hopper, 1996. National seismic-hazard maps: documentation June 1996, U.S. Geological Survey, Open-file Report: 96-532: 110 pp.
  44. G&E Engineering Systems, Inc. (G&E), 1994a, NIBS Earthquake Loss Estimation Methods, Technical Manual, Transportation Systems (Highway Systems), May 1994.
  45. G&E Engineering Systems, Inc. (G&E), 1994b, NIBS Earthquake Loss Estimation Methods, Technical Manual, Transportation Systems (Railway, Light Rail, Bus, Port, Ferry and Airport Systems), May 1994.
  46. G&E Engineering Systems, Inc. (G&E), 1994c, NIBS Earthquake Loss Estimation Methods, Technical Manual, Water Systems, May 1994.
  47. G&E Engineering Systems, Inc. (G&E), 1994d, NIBS Earthquake Loss Estimation Methods, Technical Manual, Fuel Line Systems, Communication Systems, Waste Water Systems, May 1994.
  48. G&E Engineering Systems, Inc. (G&E), 1994e, NIBS Earthquake Loss Estimation Methods, Technical Manual, Electric Power Systems, June 1994.
  49. Golden Gate Divisional Multidisciplinary Accident Investigation Team (MAIT). 1990a. I-80 San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Structure Collapse Report, Sacramento: California Highway Patrol.
  50. Golden Gate Divisional Multidisciplinary Accident Investigation Team (MAIT). 1990b. I-880 Nimitz Freeway (Cypress viaduct) Structure Collapse Report, Sacramento: California Highway Patrol.
  51. Goodman, R.E., and H.B. Seed. 1966. Earthquake-Induced Displacements in Sand Embankments. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 92, no. SM2: 125-146.
  52. Grant, W.P., Perkins, W.J. and T.L. Youd. 1991. Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential in Seattle, Washington,- USGS Professional Paper 91-0441T, United States Geological Survey.
  53. Hamada, M. 1975. Architectural Fire Resistant Themes, No 21., Kenchikugaku Taikei, Shokokusha, Tokyo.
  54. Harrald, J. R., Al-Hajj, S., Fouladi, B., and Jeong, D. 1994. Estimating the Demand for Sheltering in Future Earthquakes. IEEE Transactions in Engineering Management, (Publication currently pending).
  55. Harrald, J. R., Fouladi, B., and Al-Hajj, S. F. 1992. Estimates of Demand for Mass Care Services in Future Earthquakes Affecting the San Francisco Bay Region. Prepared by George Washington University for the American Red Cross Northern California Earthquake Relief and Preparedness Project (NCERPP), 41 pp. plus appendices.
  56. Hasselman, T.K., Ronald T. Eguchi, and John H. Wiggins. 1980. Assessment of Damageability for Existing Buildings in a Natural Hazards Environment. Volume I: Methodology. Redondo Beach.
  57. Honegger, D.G. and Eguchi, R.T. 1992. Determination of Relative Vulnerabilities to Seismic Damage for San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) Water Transmission Pipelines, (October) .
  58. Howe, C.W., and H.C. Cochrane. 1993. Guidelines for the Uniform Identification, Definition, and Measurement of Economic Damages from Natural Hazard Events, Institute of Behavioral Science: University of Colorado.
  59. International Conference of Building Officials, Uniform Fire Code, 1997.
  60. Isoyama, R. and Katayama, T.1998. Reliability Evaluation of Water Supply Systems During Earthquakes, February 1992.
  61. Jones, N. P., Smith, G. S. and R. M. Wagner. 1994. Morbidity and Mortality in the Loma Prieta Earthquake: A Review of Recent Findings. Research Accomplishments 1986-1994, NCEER: 95-106.
  62. Joyner, W.B., and D.M. Boore. 1988. Measurement, Characterization, and Prediction of Strong Ground Motion. Proceedings of Earthquake Engineering & Soil Dynamics II, 43- 102. Park City, Utah, 27 June 1988. New York: Geotechnical Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers.
  63. Keefer, D. K.1984. Landslides Caused by Earthquakes.”, Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 95: 406-421.
  64. Kennedy, R. P., C. A. Cornell, R. L. Campbell, S. Kaplan, and H. F. Perla. 1980. Probabilistic Seismic Safety of an Existing Nuclear Power Plant. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 59(2): 315‐ 38.
  65. Kircher, Charles A. 2002. Development of New Fragility Function Betas for Use with Shake Maps. prepared for the National Institute of Building Sciences and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  66. Klein, F., Frankel, A.D., Mueller, C.S., Wesson, R.L., and P. Okubo. 1998. “Documentation for Draft Seismic-Hazard Maps for the State of Hawaii”, United States Geological Survey.
  67. Klein, F., Frankel, A.D., Mueller, C.S., Wesson, R.L., and P. Okubo. 2001. “Seismic Hazard in Hawaii: High Rate of Large Earthquakes and Probabilistic Ground-Motion Maps.”, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 91, No. 3: 479-498.
  68. Knudsen, K.L, J.M. Sowers, R.C. Witter, C.M. Wentworth, E.J. Helley, R.S. Nicholson and H.M. Wright. 2000. Preliminary Maps of Quaternary Deposits and Liquefaction Susceptibility, Nine-County San Francisco Bay Region, California: a Digital Database, United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2000-444. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr00444
  69. Kustu, O., D. D. Miller, and S. T. Brokken. 1982. Development of Damage Functions for High Rise Building Components. San Francisco, Prepared by URS/John A. Blume & Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy.
  70. Lee, K. L., and Albaisa, A.. 1974. Earthquake Induced Settlement in Saturated Sands., Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE 100(GTA): 387-406.
  71. Liao, S.S., Veneziano, D., and R.V. Whitman. 1988. Regression Models for Evaluating Liquefaction Probability, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 114, No. 4 (April).
  72. Mahaney, James A., Terrence F. Paret, Bryan E. Kehoe, and Sigmund A. Freeman. 1993. The Capacity Spectrum Method for Evaluating Structural Response during the Loma Prieta Earthquake. Proceedings of the 1993 United States National Earthquake Conference, Memphis,, Vol. 2, 501‐510.
  73. Makdisi, F. I. and H.B. Seed. 1978. Simplified Procedure for Estimating Dam and Embankment Earthquake-Induced Deformations. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 104, No. GT7 (July): 849-867.
  74. Martin G.R., Finn, W.D., and H.B. Seed. 1975. Fundamentals of Liquefaction Under Cyclic Loading. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE 104(GT5): 423-438.
  75. Mohammadi, J., Alyasin, S., and Bak, D. N. 1992. Investigation of Cause and Effects of Fires Following the Loma Prieta Earthquake, Report IIT-CE-92-01, Chicago, Illinois Institute of Technology.
  76. Mueller, C.S., A.D. Frankel, M.D. Petersen and E.V. Leyendecker. 2010. New Seismic Hazard Maps for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 26, No.1: 169 – 185.
  77. Munson, C.G., and C.H. Thurber. 1997. Analysis of the Attenuation of Strong Ground Motion on the Island of Hawaii. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 87, No. 4 (August): 945-960.
  78. Murakami H. O. 1992. A Simulation Model to Estimate Human Loss for Occupants of Collapsed Buildings in an Earthquake, Proceedings of the 10. WCEE, Madrid: 5969 – 5974.
  79. National Research Council. 1985. Liquefaction of Soils During Earthquakes, Committee on Earthquake Engineering, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  80. National Bridge Inventory (NBI), 2018 https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/national-bridge-inventorysystem-nbi-1992-b9105
  81. Newmark, N.M. 1965. Effects of Earthquakes on Dams and Embankments.Geotechnique, vol. 15, no. 2: 139-160.
  82. Newmark, N.M. and W.J. Hall. 1982. Earthquake Spectra and Design. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph.
  83. Noji, E.K. 1990. Epidemic Studies from the 1988 Armenia Earthquake: Implications for Casualty Modeling, Workshop on Modeling Earthquake Casualties for Planning and Response, VSP Associates, Pacific Grove: Asilomar Conference Center.
  84. OAK Engineering Inc. (OAK). 1994. Development of Damage Functions for Buildings.
  85. O’Rourke, M.J and Ayala, G., 1993. Pipeline Damage due to Wave Propagation, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol 119, No.9, Sept. 1993.
  86. Owen, G.N. and Scholl, R.E. 1981. Earthquake Engineering Analysis of a Large Underground Structures, Federal Highway Administration and National Science Foundation, FHWA/RD- 80/195, (January).
  87. Peek-Asa, C., Kraus, J.F., Bourque, L. B., Vimalachandra, D., Yu, J. and J. Abrams. 1998. Fatal and Hospitalized Injuries Resulting From the 1994 Northridge Earthquake., International Journal of Epidemiology, V27, 459-465.
  88. Perkins, J. B. 1992. Estimates of Uninhabitable Dwelling Units in Future Earthquakes Affecting the San Francisco Bay Region. Oakland: ABAG: 89 .
  89. Perkins, J.B., Harrald, J.R., and others, unpublished. Preliminary Results of an NSF-Sponsored Project on Modeling Housing Damage in Earthquakes and Resulting Mass-Care Needs, NSF Grant BCS-9441459.
  90. Petersen, Mark D., Frankel, Arthur D., Harmsen, Stephen C., Mueller, Charles S., Haller, Kathleen M., Wheeler, Russell L., Wesson, Robert L., Zeng, Yuehua, Boyd, Oliver S., Perkins, David M., Luco, Nicolas, Field, Edward H., Wills, Chris J., and Rukstales, KennethS. 2008. “Documentation for the 2008 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1128: 61
  91. Petersen, M.D., Moschetti, M.P., Powers, P.M., Mueller, C.S., Haller, K.M., Frankel, A.D., Zeng, Yuehua, Rezaeian, Sanaz, Harmsen, S.C., Boyd, O.S., Field, Ned, Chen, Rui, Rukstales, K.S., Luco, Nico, Wheeler, R.L., Williams, R.A., and Olsen, A.H. 2014. Documentation for the 2014 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1091: 243 . https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141091.
  92. Petersen, Mark, Mueller, Charles, Moschetti, Morgan, Hoover, Susan, Shumway, Allison, Mcnamara, Daniel, Williams, Robert, Llenos, Andrea. Ellsworth, William, Michael, Andrew, Rubinstein, Justin, Mcgarr, A. and Rukstales, Kenneth. 2017. One‐Year Seismic‐Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 88: 772-783. 10.1785/0220170005.
  93. Petersen, Mark, Mueller, Charles. Moschetti, Morgan, Hoover, Susan, Rukstales, Kenneth, Mcnamara, Daniel, Williams, Robert, Shumway, Allison, Powers, Peter, Earle, Paul, Llenos, Andrea, Michael, Andrew, Rubinstein, Justin, Norbeck, Jack and Cochran, Elizabeth. 2018. 2018 One‐Year Seismic Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 89. 10.1785/0220180005.
  94. Petersen, Mark D., Allison M. Shumway, Peter M. Powers, Charles S. Mueller, Morgan P. Moschetti, Arthur D. Frankel, Sanaz Rezaeian, Daniel E. McNamara, Nico Luco, Oliver S. Boyd, Kenneth S. Rukstales, Kishor S. Jaiswal, Eric M. Thompson, Susan M. Hoover, Brandon S. Clayton, Edward H. Field and Yuehua Zeng. 2020. 2018 update of the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview of model, changes, and implications. Earthquake Spectra. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F8755293019878199.
  95. Porter, K.A., J.L. Beck, H.A. Seligson, C.R. Scawthorn, L.T. Tobin, R. Young, and T. Boyd. 2002. Improving Loss Estimation for Woodframe Buildings. CUREE-Caltech Woodframe Project, CUREE Publication No. W-18.
  96. Power, M. S., A.W. Dawson, D.W. Streiff, R.G. Perman, and S. C. Haley. 1982. Evaluation of Liquefaction Susceptibility in the San Diego, California Urban Area. Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Microzonation II: 957-968.
  97. Power, M. S., R. G. Perman, J. R. Wesling, R. R. Youngs, M. K. Shimamoto. 1991. Assessment of Liquefaction Potential in the San Jose, California Urban Area. Stanford: Proceedings 4th International Conference on Microzonation, II:,677-684.
  98. Power, M. S., Taylor, C. L., and Perman, R. C. 1994. Evaluation of Regional Landsliding Hazard Potential for Utility District – Eastern San Francisco Bay Area. Chicago: Proceedings of the U.S. Fifth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (July).
  99. Power, M.S., Wesling, J.R., Perman, R.C., Youngs, R.R., and DiSilvestro, L.A. 1992. Evaluation of liquefaction potential in San José, California. U.S. Geological Survey Final Technical Report, Award no. 14-08-0001-G1359, (May):, 65
  100. Rogers, A. M., S. T. Algermissen, W. W. Hays, D. M. Perkins, D. 0. Van Strien, H. C. Hughes, R. C. Hughes, H. J. Lagorio, and K. V. Steinbrugge. 1976. A Study of Earthquake Losses in the Salt Lake City, Utah Area. USGS Open-File Report,. Washington, D.C.: United States Geological Survey: 76-89.
  101. Sadigh, K., Chang C. Y., Egan, J., Makdisi, F. and R. Youngs. 1997. Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes based on California Strong Motion Data. Seismological Research Letters, v. 68, no. 1: 180-189.
  102. Sadigh, K., Egan, J. A., and Youngs, R. R. 1986. Specification of Ground Motion for Seismic Design of Long Period Structures. Earthquake Notes, vol. 57, no. 1: 13, relationships are tabulated in Joyner and Boore (1988) and Youngs and others (1987).
  103. Scawthorn, C., J. Donelan. 1984. Fire-Related Aspects of the Coalinga Earthquake. In Coalinga California Earthquake of May 2 1983: Reconnaissance Report. Report 84-03. Berkeley, CA: EERI.
  104. Scawthorn, C., G. Bureau, C. Jessup, R. Delgado. 1985. Fire-Related Aspects of 24 April 1984 Morgan Hill Earthquake. Spectra 1, no. 3, (May): 675-685.
  105. Scawthorn, C. 1987. Fire following earthquake: estimates of the conflagration risk to insured property in greater Los Angeles and San Francisco. Oak Brook: All-Industry Research Advisory Council.
  106. Scawthorn, C., K. A. Porter, et al. 1991. Performance of Emergency Response Services After the Earthquake. Chapter in The Loma Prieta California Earthquake of October 17 1989 – Marina District. USGS Prof. Paper 1551-F, edited by O’Rourke, T.D. and Holzer, T.,. Washington GPO.
  107. Scawthorn, C. 1996. Fire Following the Northridge and Kobe Earthquakes, U.S./Japan Government Cooperative Program on Natural Resources (UJNR). Fire Research and Safety. 13th Joint Panel Meeting. Volume 2 , edited by Beall, K. A.,:325-335, 1997, Gaithersburg: National Inst. Of Standards and Technology.
  108. Scawthorn, C., Cowell, A. D., and Borden, F. 1997. Fire-Related Aspects of the Northridge Earthquake. Report prepared for the Building and Fire Research Laboratory, Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST-GCR-98-743.
  109. Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. 1982. Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland: Monograph Series, 13.
  110. Seed, H. B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L. F. and Chung, R. M. 1985. ”Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 111, no. 12, 1425-1445.
  111. Seed, R. B., and Harder, L. F. 1990. SPT-Based Analysis of Cyclic Pore Pressure Generation and Undrained Residual Strength, Proceedings of the H. B. Seed Memorial Symposium, vol. 2: 351-376.
  112. Shiono, K., Krimgold, F. and Ohta, Y. 1991a. A Method for the Estimation of Earthquake Fatalities and its Applicability to the Global Macro-Zonation of Human Casualty Risk, Proc. Fourth International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Stanford, Vol. III: 277 – 284.
  113. Shiono, K., Krimgold, F., Ohta, Y. 1991b. Post-Event Rapid Estimation of Earthquake Fatalities for the Management of Rescue Activity. Comprehensive Urban Studies, No. 44: 61 – 105.
  114. Silva, W., Gregor, N., and Darragh, R. 2002. Development of hard rock attenuation relations for central and eastern North America, internal report from Pacific Engineering, (November).
  115. Somerville, P., Collins, N., Abrahamson, R., and C. Saikia. 2001. Ground-motion Attenuation Relationships for the Central and Eastern United States, final report to the U.S. Geological Survey.
  116. Somerville, P., N.F. Collins, N.A. Abrahamson, R.W. Graves and C.K. Saikia, 2002, “Earthquake Source Scaling and Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations in Eastern North America”, American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting, December 2002, abstract id. S21B0994.
  117. SPA Risk. 2009. Enhancements in Hazus-MH Fire Following Earthquake, Task 3: Updated Ignition Equation, SPA Project No. 10010-01-07-01, SPA Risk LLC, Berkeley CA. Principal Investigator C. Scawthorn. San Francisco: Prepared for PBS&J and the National Institute of Building Sciences.
  118. State of California, Division of the State Architect (DSA). 1996. Earthquake Hazard Mitigation Technology Application Guidelines. Sacramento.
  119. State of California, Seismic Safety Commission (SSC). 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. Report No. SSC 96‐01, Sacramento.
  120. State of California, Seismic Safety Commission (SSC). 1995. Turning Loss to Gain. Report No. SSC 95‐01, Sacramento.
  121. Stewart, Jonathan P. and Emel Seyhan. 2013. Semi-Empirical Nonlinear Site Amplification and its Application in NEHRP Site Factors, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report, PEER 2013/13. https://peer.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/webpeer-2013-13jonathan_p._stewart _and_emel_seyhan.pdf.
  122. Stojanovski, P., Dong, W.1994 Simulation Model for Earthquake Casualty Estimation, Proc. Fifth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 00592, Chicago: (July): 10-14.
  123. Tang, A. and Wong, F.1994, Observation on Telecommunications Lifeline Performance in the Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994, Magnitude 6.6.
  124. Tavakoli, B., and Pezeshk, S. 2005. Empirical-stochastic ground-motion prediction for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 95, 2283–2296.
  125. Tinsley, J. C., T. L. Youd, D. M. Perkins, and A. T. F. Chen. 1985. Evaluating Liquefaction Potential, Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region, USGS Professional Paper 1360:263-316.
  126. Tokimatsu, A. M., and Seed, H. B. 1987. Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking. Journal of the Geotechnical Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 113, no. 8: 681-878.
  127. Toro, G. R., Abrahamson, N. A. and Schneider, J. F. 1997. Engineering Model of Strong Ground Motions from Earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States. Seismological Research Letters, v. 68: 41-57.
  128. Updike, R. G., Egan, J. A., Moriwaki, Y., Idriss, I. M., and Moses, T. L. 1988. A Model for Earthquake-Induced Translatory Landslides in Quaternary Sediments., Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 100, (May):783-792.
  129. Wagner, R. M. 1996. A Case-Control Study of Risk Factors for Physical Injury During the Mainshock of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake in the County of Santa Cruz, California, Ph.D. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
  130. Wells, D. L., and Coppersmith, K. J. 1994. New Empirical Relationships Among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, and Surface Displacement., Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v 84: 974-1002.
  131. Wesson, Robert L., Boyd, Oliver S., Mueller, Charles S., Bufe, Charles G., Frankel, Arthur D., Petersen, Mark D. 2007. Revision of time-Independent probabilistic seismic hazard maps for Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1043.
  132. Whitman, Robert V., Tarek S. Aziz and Earl H. Wong. 1977. Preliminary Correlations Between Earthquake Damage and Strong Ground Motion. Boston:Structures Publication No. 564, Dept. of Civil Engineering, M.I.T.
  133. Wieczorek, G. F., Wilson, R. C. and Harp, E. L. 1985. Map of Slope Stability During Earthquakes in San Mateo County, California, U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map I1257-E, scale 1:62,500.
  134. Wiggins, J. H. 1988. Fire Ignitions from the Whittier Narrows Earthquake of October 1, 1987, Crisis Management Corp.
  135. Wilson, R. C., and Keefer D. K. 1985. Predicting Areal Limits of Earthquake Induced Landsliding, Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, edited by Ziony, J. I.: 317-493.
  136. Witter, R.C., K.L. Knudsen, J.M Sowers, C.M. Wentworth, R.D Koehler, C.E Randolph, S.K. Brooks and K.D Gans. 2006. Maps of Quaternary Deposits and Liquefaction Susceptibility in the Central San Francisco Bay Region, California. United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1037. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20061037
  137. Wong, Earl Hom. 1975. Correlations Between Earthquake Damage and Strong Ground Motion. Boston: Dept. of Civil Engineering, M.I.T.
  138. Youd, T. L., and Hoose, S. N. 1978. Historic Ground Failures in Northern California Triggered by Earthquakes. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 993: 177.
  139. Youd, T. L., and Perkins, D. M. 1978. Mapping of Liquefaction Induced Ground Failure Potential., Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 104, no. 4: 433-446.
  140. Youd, T. L., and Perkins, D. M. 1987. Mapping of Liquefaction Severity Index., Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 118, no. 11: 1374-1392.
  141. Youngs R. R., Chiou, S. J., Silva W. L., and Humphrey J. R. 1997. Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction Zone Earthquakes., Seismological Research Letters, (January/February).
  142. Zhao J.X., Zhang, J., Asano, A., Ohno, Y., Oouchi, T., Takahashi, T., Ogawa, H., Irikura, K., Thio, H., Somerville, P., Fukushima, Y., and Fukushima, Y. 2006. Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period., Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 96: 898–913.

اترك تعليقاً